Wednesday, November 16, 2005


With more and more info leaking out with respect to the government's secret ABLE DANGER project (thanks to Curt Weldon), its time for the question of the ANTHRAX attacks of 2001 be re-visited. Weldon has recently revealed that ABLE DANGER, in addition to spotting ATTA and the other ringleaders of the 9/11 attacks, months ahead of the actual attack, also identified those associated with the attack on the USS COLE, MONTHS ahead of that attack!

What if the real reason that the government has squashed all inquiries into ABLE DANGER is because, ABLE DANGER was able to link individuals to the ANTHRAX attack of 2001? This is a potentially explosive idea. Philip Brennen (in Newsmax) has the following to say about Able Danger:
I am led to revisit the [Anthrax attack] case partly by the disclosure by Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., about the Able Danger affair, which suggests that 9/11 mastermind Mohamed Atta either ran circles around the U.S. intelligence community or they were simply asleep at the switch. In any event, it now appears that Atta scattered false clues about his whereabouts in the run-up to 9/11, and the FBI continues to swallow them whole.

If the Able Danger operatives are right – and everything points to that conclusion – starting in 2000 Atta was all over the place, evading detection of his whereabouts by the FBI, which to this day insists it has the evidence to back up its claims that it can pinpoint his locations prior to 9/11, when he piloted a highjacked jet into the north tower of the World Trade Center.

Is it possible that the government is covering up ABLE DANGER because it was also able to identify who was involved in the ANTHRAX attacks? Could ATTA and his boys have set up the Anthrax attack as a follow-up attack from beyond the grave? Or is there something much more sinister at play here...?